The payment model defines the event that turns a referral into revenue. The same audience can produce different results under CPA, CPL, CPS and RevShare, so the headline commission never tells the full story.

Interlocking lime and silver links, illustrating affiliate partnerships.

CPA: payment for an action

Cost per action covers programs that pay for a defined event such as an app install, account registration, first deposit or subscription. The offer terms specify which event qualifies. Actions closer to revenue tend to pay more and convert less often.

Check the approval process before launch. Duplicate details, invalid data and prohibited traffic can turn reported conversions into rejected ones.

In gambling, a CPA commonly relates to a qualified new depositing customer. The acronym alone does not identify the baseline, market, verification or acquisition conditions. A registration, an FTD and a payable CPA event must remain separate in the report.

CPL: payment for a lead

Cost per lead appears in insurance, education, property, B2B and financial services. A visitor submits contact details or completes an application, then the advertiser’s sales team handles the sale.

Ask how the program defines a valid lead and review the approval rate. Cheap traffic may fill forms without producing customers. Clear content pre-qualifies visitors and improves lead quality.

CPS: payment for a sale

Cost per sale pays a fixed amount or a percentage of an order. Reviews, comparisons, deal pages and product-led tutorials suit this model because readers arrive with commercial intent.

Account for cancellations, returns and attribution windows. Expensive purchases take time to research, so a short cookie window can reduce credited sales.

RevShare: a share of revenue

Revenue share gives you a percentage of the revenue generated by a referred customer. Subscription software may pay on each renewal while the account remains active.

Ask which revenue base the program uses, which costs it deducts and whether negative balances carry into the next month. Long-term earnings depend on retention and transparent reporting.

Compare effective value

ModelCommission eventMain risk
CPADefined actionRejected conversions
CPLQualified leadLow lead approval
CPSCompleted saleReturns and short cookies
RevShareCustomer revenuePoor retention or opaque deductions

Compare earnings per click and approved revenue per 1,000 visits. Those figures include both payout and conversion quality.

FTD qualification is part of the price

Before comparing rates, establish exactly which customers qualify. The agreement may require a minimum deposit, new-customer status, verification, an eligible market and an approved source. It may also define a qualification window or cap on payable acquisitions.

With 50 reported FTDs but only 40 qualified acquisitions, a EUR 120 CPA produces EUR 4,800. Multiplying the rate by all 50 deposits overstates commission by EUR 1,200. Ask for the difference to be explained through status and reason fields, rather than treating it as a single unexplained rejection rate.

CPL and CPS labels need the same care. A registration is not automatically a paid lead, and a deposit is not a retail sale. If a proposal uses an ambiguous event name, ask the manager to describe the action and qualification conditions in ordinary language.

NGR is a contractual base, not a universal formula

Net gaming revenue is defined by the agreement. The starting revenue measure and deductions can differ by operator and product. Deposits are a funding flow; they should not be substituted for gaming revenue. Poker, sportsbook and casino reporting can also use different commercial bases.

Inspect how bonuses, taxes, payment costs, chargebacks, provider costs and other adjustments are treated. Check the order of calculation. A cost deducted from revenue before applying your percentage has a different effect from a cost charged against commission afterward.

The WPT Partners terms demonstrate why product and commission-plan definitions need to be read together. Use the agreement attached to your own deal as the source of truth.

If permitted deductions reduce a EUR 10,000 starting base to EUR 7,000, a 35% share pays EUR 2,450. A 40% share of EUR 5,500 pays EUR 2,200. The larger percentage does not compensate for every difference in the underlying base.

Read carryover at the player and account level

Negative carryover determines whether a negative balance affects a later settlement period. Establish whether the rule operates by player, brand, product or the whole affiliate account. Several brands in one account may not be economically independent.

A no-negative-carryover headline can have exceptions. The PlayAmo Partners terms include a separate high-roller policy. That is a reason to inspect the exception language, not to assume every program treats it identically.

Where EUR 2,000 of negative NGR carries into a later EUR 6,000 positive period, the remaining base is EUR 4,000 under that arrangement. At 35%, commission is EUR 1,400. Without that offset, the same positive period would produce EUR 2,100.

Ask whether a negative balance belonging to one player can offset other players, whether casino and sportsbook balances interact and what happens on termination. Those details can change the value of a deal more than a small increase in its headline rate.

Hybrid needs two definitions and one reconciliation

A hybrid combines acquisition-based payment with revenue share. Confirm that both components are additive and identify any recoupment, deduction or offset. Do not assume a CPA payment sits outside the revenue-share calculation simply because the offer sheet lists both.

Commission under a fully additive hybrid
ComponentInputsCommission
CPA30 qualified FTDs × EUR 60EUR 1,800
RevShareEUR 4,000 eligible NGR × 20%EUR 800
TotalNo additional offsetsEUR 2,600

If the contract recoups acquisition costs elsewhere, the total changes. Request a reconciliation showing the acquisition component, NGR, rate and adjustments. A combined dashboard total is not enough to identify a disputed calculation.

CPA, RevShare and hybrid distribute timing and volatility differently. The appropriate choice depends on acquisition costs, payment delays and the evidence available about the referred audience. The program evaluation checklist puts those commercial details alongside product fit.

Compare cohort age, source and product mix

A cohort groups acquisitions from a defined period and source. Compare month-one results with month-one results before drawing conclusions about operators. An older group has had more time to generate revenue, while a new group may still contain acquisitions waiting for qualification.

Keep casino and sportsbook results distinguishable when their timing differs. A major sports event can affect volume and results in a way that makes a single blended month difficult to interpret. Also check whether currency conversion happens before or after commission is calculated.

Use aggregate retention and revenue reporting to evaluate the product relationship. Do not turn a commercial retention target into pressure on excluded or vulnerable players. The Gambling Commission’s direct-marketing guidance for affiliates explains the particular sensitivity of self-exclusion in Great Britain.

Finally, reconcile approved commission with cash received. With EUR 4,800 from 2,000 outbound clicks, EPC is EUR 2.40. At a 25% landing-to-operator rate, revenue per landing visit is EUR 0.60. The traffic-source guide uses that distinction to evaluate what a campaign can afford to acquire.

The Affiliates Club editorial team

Practical guides to affiliate programs, traffic and project economics.